Response to the Double Bass and Black as a Color

What the dog wants and what the poem wants are maybe the same thing – to be let out, to eat, to be paid attention to. But various moments have various demands and so often it feels like one is just pushing paper around, rearranging things.

But then one wants to be let in. Or left alone. And what one had put down a moment ago is now impossible to find.

Execution of the thing itself – one feels the dis-ease of having to say something, having to speak. The question is how to include the parentheticals, the italicized thought, without actually using parentheses or italics and perhaps without even including the words themselves.

One is reminded of that long-ago figure of Rilke before his Cezannes – the ordering of words to mean what words had not been made to speak in order to meet this strange new use of color.

Just this morning I saw a woman stretch her perfect angular body this way and that before jumping into the pool and swimming lap after lap after lap. Later, another woman bent into similar angles in the kitchen of a house for rent, painting the cupboards black.

Standing before any thing one wants to be the thing left out. Resistance, attraction, agitation. The mind won’t stay seated for long.

If I moved this chair or this color would it change the whole room?

I simultaneously imagine telling my friend on the phone “Something tremendous is happening to me” and finding a big fat flea on the belly of the dog.

What is one in relation to black? Having to be the absence of that.

The way one resents having to eat, move, touch taste, fashion a response, act – when nothing else does.

The recitation of a list of names as incantation against ending. Think of it: any names, all that one can remember, baseball players, jazz musicians, actresses, presidents, recited silently in the mind while making love.

And there are different kinds of black. The infinitely long arm of the boy in the picture by Cezanne. What impels the dog to get up and move one spot to the next? What makes one stop before this color or that?

With white it’s different. All you can do is divide it with a line or a gesture or a remark.

Even to say white – what does it make one do? Makes one want to go outside, wave one’s arms in the air in imitation of a tree against the light of the sky.

Black as diction. As subset of words one might choose if one were to say some such thing. And then to step out of that both as deliberate shift in tone and the resignation of throwing up one’s hands. To be then told: no, this doesn’t fit, you should’ve stayed in black.

Awkward silence. Not merely the bird in flight but its path of flight and precise distance receding.

It is precisely because one wanted to use some word that it must not be uttered, one must press it down in the mind until it is not even thought but still there behind and above the others, informing and as it were uttering them.

H O R I Z O N L I N E S

Momentarily alone in a room
with a view of a ship:
H O R I Z O N L I N E S
and trees, water, sky
gathers behind you to push you
farther into the view—
out there, you are a circle
meeting yourself estranged,
a camera focusing on two
people alone in a room—
his hand on her ass
and she’s into it but
breaks away, having to get
ready to go, screen goes fuzzy
and camera zooms in on
the same couple, much
older now, hands clasped
across table, laughing.
I want you to live
a long life—of course,
who wouldn’t? After all,
we’re all here. But
we’re a collection of lines,
breaking. You walk to
another room, see
a different view, the ship gone,
a jagged line of trees
and the open water, camera
focuses on a body laid out
on stone, lying down
but not silent,
at rest but not quiet,
because words won’t leave it
alone, it doesn’t know
how to stop them
even in death, doesn’t know what
not to say, how to shut up.
So as it lies there words
swarm over the body, incessant
and fleeting, biography
breaking down, poodle left
in the yard and a cat
and a game of scrabble as yet
unfinished. Broken toilet
trickling in a dark room.
Can you fix that? I dunno.
Maybe. Step into another room
and there’s that ship again—
H O R I Z O N L I N E S, glimpsed
from the other direction so
all’s land rising behind it,
hills and the school looming
over the harbor. Camera
pans over a road, follows
a car driving through pines
and maples shifting bronze
against reds and greens—
Why are you smiling?
No reason. Looking for the place
you’re going to, not trying
too hard to find it,
no reason strained after,
nothing to find. This
will be one of those
remembered things.

Ovid in Exile

Ovid in Exile, my new book from Interbirth Books (Austin, TX), is now available. There are currently about 15 copies left after the reading last night—the rest of them still need to be sewn—and I wanted to send out a note to let people know how to get a copy.


The books are quite beautiful: traditional Coptic stitch, hard covers, cover and back art courtesy of Amy Trachtenberg. 45 pages, w/ an introduction by Dale Smith.

by check: $15 to Micah Robbins (Interbirth Books) — please include $2 for shipping
111 Stanford Dr.
Leander, TX 78641

Or click on the paypal link above.

For anyone who orders a copy of Ovid via paypal, I’ll throw in the latest issue of kadar koli, featuring work by Tom Clark, Elizabeth Robinson, many others.

—-thanks, by the way, to everyone who came to the reading; to Richard Owens, for flying down from Buffalo and giving a wonderful and energetic reading; to Dale for introducing him; to Micah Robbins for introducing me (and for sewing all those #$%@ing books!); to Luke for hosting the reading at 12th st; for Dale and Hoa for having folks over afterwards; to Tina for taking pictures and putting up with all the madness..

Ovid in Exile / kadar koli reading this Sat. night

Thanks to Amy Trachtenberg for the cover art image; Micah Robbins and Clifton Riley for their hard, tireless work on the book

Kadar Koli #2 is Ready!



Here it is, folks, front and back. Cheaper than a gallon of gas!

Covers by Marcus Civin, saddle-stitched
60pp
Featuring work by Tom Clark, Marcia Roberts, John Phillips, Micah Robbins, Marcus Civin and Mathew Timmons, Amy King, Richard Owens, Kyle Schlesinger, Elizabeth Robinson, C.J. Martin, Mary Burger, Tom Peters, Lauren Dixon, Nick Courtright, and Andrew Neuendorf

There will be a reading at 7pm next Saturday, 12th St. Books in Austin, featuring Richard Owens (editor, Damn the Caesars) who’s visiting from Buffalo, and me (celebrating the book release of Ovid in Exile from Micah Robbins’ Interbirth Press). More on that soon… hope to see you all there!

What Can I Get You?

So you walk into a bar and the person behind the counter says, “What can I get you?”

You don’t know. In fact, you can’t even say you don’t know, because to say that implies some kind of knowing you might have apart from this question, i.e., ‘I don’t know what I’d like to drink, but I know what a drink is, and ordinarily I could quite easily tell you what I’d like to drink. I’ll get back to you in a minute.’

In fact, you don’t know. In the most profound, extreme sense of the word. You don’t know who the person behind the bar refers to when he says, “What would you like to drink?” Is that even what he asked you? You’re not sure. You don’t know what it means to like or to get, all you know is this vague, dry sort of feeling, a prickly sensation inside you, coming from an area about a finger’s length down and back from where words come out when you open your mouth.

Wait – do words come out? You open your mouth and a sound issues from your lips, a noise is emitted that seems to travel from where you are to the person behind the bar, who responds, nodding his head. Good, you think – but – does he understand you? Is he just humoring you? After all, he hasn’t moved to get you that drink.

He stares at you with frank curiosity, perhaps wonder, hostility mixed with concern, passion mixed with disgust, pity mixed with accusation.

Who are you?

No, really?

Why have you walked into all this? It was a nice, pleasant place till you came along. The bartender was about to tell a story about his mother’s hands. The way they seemed to act quite independently of her at times, each finger on each hand, he says, had a personality of its own.

“Hello!” one finger (the left index) would say to another (the right pinky), as it curled across the breakfast table, index tapping pinky on the tip. “Wake up! It’s time to lift spoon, pour coffee, raise cup and drink! Come on – I need your help!” Index finger a bit more sprightly and nimble than pinky – pinky flabby and a little stiff.

“Tell you what,” index said, “I’ll tell you a story to help wake you up and get the blood pumping.”

Oh, this is absurd, you think. More because the keen sense of identity of the bartender’s mother’s individual fingers is so much more developed than your own. And you have a whole body to work with, a mind and memories, likes and dislikes, a sense of morality and so on. You sigh, lean forward, and listen:

Once there was a good
, beautiful hand at the end of a long, evil arm. Every time the good and beautiful hand, whose name was Gwendolyn, wanted to do something good and beautiful – like fold a sheet of paper into the shape of a snowflake, or toss a dart at a dart board, or spread raspberry jam on a piece of warm, fresh bread – the long, evil arm, whose name was Fred, would ruin it. He would suddenly jerk so that the paper snowflake crumpled into a ball, or pull back so that the dart sailed wide of the board, or go numb so that the jam wound up on Gwendolyn rather than the slice of bread she held.

(to be continued..?)