Fibonacci Sequence #1

the

light

seen through

thick and thin

darkens, a wave comes in

the form of a bird
call, then abrupt

silence, which is equal to
dark and also its
opposite, attempt to be

too many things at once, long
tailfeathers quickly gliding and
gone over the roof into trees —
echo of light, dark quiet.

Just sit here and wait. Field glasses
too narrow to take it all in. Flutter
of wings, wind, mind, drop

what you’re doing and listen.
Thickness upon thickness, dream
upon dream. Over, out.

It will come back. It will
come back.

Match strike. Sharp
intake of

breath. Almost
there.

Through the

light,

seen.

Read Andrew’s Fibonacci poem here (while it lasts) (scroll down to “Fibonacci’s Dawn”)

This entry was posted in Oulipostal. Bookmark the permalink.

44 Responses to Fibonacci Sequence #1

  1. Tina. says:

    me likes. very much.

  2. SW says:

    I like the precision very much, David. I wonder (as I often do — I’m a fairly simple guy) about how the lines carry energy, and if you read for the lines or ignore them when reciting the poem. I would spend hours awake at night if I left a preposition dangling.

  3. dhad says:

    well in this case the breaks were wholly dictacted by the form, although they turned out mostly in places i might’ve chosen anyway. i just like that slight hesitation and hiccup in rhythm and would hope that the suspense of not knowing what the object of the “of” or “the” carries one’s interest to the next line. and i would read the break w/ more or less slight of a pause depending on where and how it falls.

  4. SW says:

    why not just drop such words?

  5. dhad says:

    you mean like “of” and “the”? i can really see only one, possibly two instances where that’s possible without changing the meaning and/or losing the sense of the phrase. e.g. “sharp intake/breath” doesn’t sound right to me. also i like foregrounding those words to some extent. didn’t stein say something about preps and articles being almost primary to the language? also i like presenting that sense of hesitation one often feels before choosing the right object. but this is all after the fact.

  6. sw says:

    yes, i agree. Just wondering about your personal poetics. I’ve been influenced a lot by Ginsberg’s notion of finding through the at times violent juxtaposition of image and / or idea that a new concept / sense / reality springs forth. From where? Maybe from language itself.

  7. Pingback: Samantha

  8. Pingback: Andrew

  9. Pingback: Anthony

  10. Pingback: Anthony

  11. Pingback: Abigail

  12. Pingback: Emily

  13. Pingback: Samantha

  14. Pingback: Michael

  15. Pingback: Anthony

  16. Pingback: Abigail

  17. Pingback: Olivia

  18. Pingback: Samantha

  19. Pingback: Andrew

  20. Pingback: Hannah

  21. Pingback: Daniel

  22. Pingback: Christopher

  23. Pingback: Ethan

  24. Pingback: Joshua

  25. Pingback: Emily

  26. Pingback: Samantha

  27. Pingback: Andrew

  28. Pingback: Abigail

  29. Pingback: Joseph

  30. Pingback: Samantha

  31. Pingback: Jacob

  32. Pingback: Christopher

  33. Pingback: Ethan

  34. Pingback: Michael

  35. nxkduoxljh says:

    how to play mexican poker

  36. Pingback: Michael

  37. Pingback: Madison

  38. Pingback: Joseph

  39. Pingback: Joseph

  40. Pingback: Joseph

  41. Pingback: Isabella

  42. Pingback: Seduction Techniques

  43. limewire says:

    Hi boys!650bd94c9ca3d15f03e3eaf7784b9aae

  44. Pingback: Primitive Information » Blog Archive » Fibonacci Redux

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *